Blog · Paid Media Paid Media

How to Get Better Leads from Direct Lead Ads

Lead ads generate volume. They rarely generate quality. Here’s the specific setup (form structure, audience, follow-up) that gets you leads worth actually calling.

JB Josh Berg · · 6 min read

Lead ads are the easiest way to generate volume. They’re also one of the easiest ways to generate a hundred leads that go nowhere.

The problem isn’t the format. Meta Lead Ads and Google Lead Form extensions are useful tools. The problem is that most accounts using them are optimising for cost per lead without ever asking whether those leads are any good.

Here’s what changes when you focus on lead quality instead of lead volume.

#Key summary

At a glance
  • The frictionless experience that makes lead ads attractive is also what produces low-quality, passive submissions. Design forms to require a small amount of deliberate effort
  • Adding one qualifying question reduces volume and dramatically improves lead quality; the context card before the form is also underused
  • Warm audiences (website visitors, video viewers, customer lists) produce fundamentally better leads than cold traffic. Start there
  • Speed of follow-up is critical: leads contacted within five minutes convert significantly better than those left for hours
  • Cost per lead is the wrong metric: the number that matters is cost per qualified lead or cost per converted customer

#Why lead ads produce low-quality leads by default

The frictionless experience that makes lead ads attractive (no redirect to a website, pre-filled contact details, one or two taps to submit) is also what makes them easy to submit without thinking.

Someone scrolling through their feed sees an offer that looks interesting. They tap. Their name and email are already filled in. They submit before they’ve really decided they want to hear from you. By the time your sales team calls, they’ve already forgotten what they signed up for.

Compare that to a lead who found you through search, clicked through to your website, read your service page, scrolled to the bottom, and filled in a contact form. That person is significantly more qualified. They invested time and effort to reach you. The lead ad submission cost them almost nothing.

This doesn’t mean lead ads are wrong. It means you need to design them to attract people who actually want what you’re offering.

#The form structure that filters better leads

Lead form friction spectrum: fewer questions means more volume and worse quality; more questions means fewer submissions and better leads
The friction trade-off: fewer fields means more submissions and worse leads. More fields means fewer submissions and better leads. The right balance depends on your average deal value.

The number of questions in your lead form directly affects both quantity and quality. Fewer questions means more submissions and worse leads. More questions means fewer submissions and better leads. The right balance depends on your business, but the principle holds universally.

Add at least one qualifying question. For a service business, this might be: “What’s the main challenge you’re trying to solve?” or “What’s your approximate budget for this project?” or “When are you looking to get started?” These questions do two things: they make the person think before submitting, and they give your sales team context for the follow-up call.

Use a context card. The intro card before the form fields is underused. Most accounts leave it generic. Use it to set expectations: what happens after they submit, who will contact them, and when. This reduces the number of people who submit out of curiosity and then screen your calls.

Remove pre-filled fields for high-value leads. Counter-intuitive, but making people type their own name and email instead of accepting the pre-filled data introduces just enough friction to filter out passive submitters. Use this for higher-ticket services where lead quality matters more than volume.

#Audience makes more difference than the form

The best-designed form in the world won’t save a badly targeted campaign. If you’re running lead ads to a cold audience of three million people with broad interest targeting, you will get volume and it will be mostly low quality.

Warm audiences first. Run lead ads to your website visitors, video viewers, and existing customer lists before you touch cold audiences. These people already know who you are. Their submissions carry intent that cold traffic simply doesn’t have.

Lookalike audiences from your best customers. Build a custom audience from your actual customers (specifically the ones who converted well, not just anyone who ever enquired) and create a lookalike from that. You’re telling Meta to find people who resemble people who already bought from you, which is a fundamentally better starting point than demographic or interest targeting.

Exclude existing customers and recent converters. Standard practice but frequently missed. If you’re advertising to people who already work with you, you’re wasting budget and diluting your lead quality data.

#The follow-up is half the conversion

Lead conversion rate by response time: leads contacted within five minutes convert dramatically better than those left for an hour or more
Response speed has an outsized effect on conversion. Leads contacted within five minutes convert dramatically better than leads followed up hours later.

Lead ads have a speed problem. Research consistently shows that leads contacted within five minutes convert significantly better than leads contacted after an hour, and dramatically better than leads left for 24 hours.

Most businesses are not set up to contact leads within five minutes. Their lead data goes to a spreadsheet, or an email, or into a CRM that nobody checks immediately. By the time someone calls, the person has moved on.

Set up instant notification. Connect your lead form to a tool that sends an immediate alert: a Slack message, a text to the sales team’s phone, an automated email. The goal is to know within seconds, not hours.

Use an automated first-touch message. An instant automated text or email from a real person’s name acknowledging the enquiry keeps the lead warm while someone follows up. “Hi Sarah, thanks for your enquiry. One of the team will be in touch within the hour” does a lot of work.

Build a follow-up sequence. Not everyone answers the first call. A sequence of three or four touchpoints across the first 48 hours (a mix of calls, texts, and emails) dramatically increases the conversion rate of leads that would otherwise go cold.

#Tracking quality, not just volume

Cost per lead versus cost per customer: a campaign with low cost per lead but poor conversion is less valuable than one with higher cost per lead but strong conversion
Cost per lead is a vanity metric if you never close the loop. A campaign generating fewer leads at higher cost per lead can be far more profitable if those leads actually convert.

If you’re only reporting cost per lead, you’re flying blind on quality. The metric that matters is cost per qualified lead, or better, cost per converted customer.

This requires closing the loop between your ad platform and your CRM or sales process. When a lead converts to a sale, that information needs to make its way back so you can see which campaigns, audiences, and form variants are producing customers rather than just contacts.

Even a rough version of this, manually tagging leads by source in your CRM and reviewing them monthly, gives you enough signal to make better decisions than optimising purely for volume.

A campaign generating 50 leads at $20 each but converting at 2% is less valuable than a campaign generating 20 leads at $50 each but converting at 15%. Cost per lead will tell you the first campaign is winning. Cost per customer will tell you the second one is.

#One thing to fix this week

If your lead ads are generating volume but poor-quality enquiries, the single biggest fix is adding one qualifying question to your form: something that requires the person to think about their situation before submitting.

It will reduce your lead volume. It will improve your lead quality. Your cost per lead will go up and your cost per customer will go down.

That is the trade-off worth making.

Josh Berg
Written by

Josh Berg

Founder & Head of Strategy, Hedgehog Marketing

Digital marketing strategist and educator. Founder of Hedgehog Marketing, where he’s spent a decade teaching small businesses to own their marketing. Specialises in SEO, content strategy, and helping businesses make sense of a rapidly changing digital landscape.

← All articles View original on hedgehogmarketing.com.au →